Statistical Characterization of Plant Biosensor Data: Distributional Properties and Inter-Variable Relationships
Plant Biosensor Data: Distributional Properties and Inter-Variable Relationships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54393/fbt.v6i2.243Keywords:
Precision Agriculture, Plant Health Monitoring, Biosensors, Soil Moisture, Environmental Sensing, Statistical AnalysisAbstract
Precision agriculture is now increasingly being monitored with continuous biosensors. But many datasets are analyzed for predictive modeling without any basic statistical properties of the data being characterized, which is required to be able to determine whether it is appropriate for downstream use. Objectives: To characterize the distributional properties of the key environmental and soil biosensor variables, to assess the linear relations among variables, and to determine if the biosensor readings vary systematically across individual plants of a biosensor-monitored dataset. Methods: A de-identified dataset of plant biosensor readings was used, consisting of 120 readings per plant from 10 plants spanning an approximate 6-hour time interval. The soil moisture, ambient temperature, soil temperature, humidity, light intensity, soil pH, nitrogen level, and phosphorus level were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were conducted, normality was tested, and ANOVA was used. Results: All variables showed very peaked and leptokurtic distribution shapes (skewness and excess kurtosis values close to zero). The patterns here are not a formal goodness-of-fit test against a uniform distribution, so they are not definitive statements of uniformity, but rather hypotheses that should be considered. Conclusions: The distributional patterns of the biosensor variables were very symmetrical and flattened (indicating uniformity) and had very low inter-variable correlation. The statistical characteristics in these readings indicate that single-timepoint readings alone might not be suitable for predicting an outcome in a meaningful way without extra labeled outcome data and engineered temporal properties. The results provide a baseline of statistics to be used in subsequent research with this data.
References
Dhanaraju M, Chenniappan P, Ramalingam K, Pazhanivelan S, Kaliaperumal R. Smart Farming: Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Sustainable Agriculture. Agriculture. 2022 Oct; 12(10): 1745. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12101745.
Li XH, Li MZ, Li JY, Gao YY, Liu CR, Hao GF. Wearable Sensor Supports in‐Situ and Continuous Monitoring of Plant Health in the Precision Agriculture Era. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2024 Jun; 22(6): 1516-35. doi: 10.1111/pbi.14283.
Jayabharathi SP and Theresa K. Nanobiosensors: Enabling Next-Generation Soil and Plant Health Monitoring. Frontiers in Nanotechnology. 2026 Aug; 8: 1832447. doi: 10.3389/fnano.2026.1832447.
Chaturvedi A, Tripathi D, Ranjan R. Nano-Enabled Biosensors in Early Detection of Plant Diseases. Frontiers in Nanotechnology. 2025 Apr; 7: 1545792. doi: 10.3389/fnano.2025.1545792.
Zhang X, Feng G, Sun X. Advanced Technologies of Soil Moisture Monitoring in Precision Agriculture: A Review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 2024 Dec; 18: 101473. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101473.
Narware J, Chakma J, Singh SP, Prasad DR, Meher J, Singh P et al. Nanomaterial-Based Biosensors: A New Frontier in Plant Pathogen Detection and Plant Disease Management. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2025 Apr; 13: 1570318. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1570318.
Elvanidi A and Katsoulas N. Machine Learning-Based Crop Stress Detection in Greenhouses. Plants. 2022 Dec; 12(1): 52. doi: 10.3390/plants12010052.
Walsh JJ, Mangina E, Negrão S. Advancements in Imaging Sensors and AI for Plant Stress Detection: A Systematic Literature Review. Plant Phenomics. 2024 Mar; 6: 0153. doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0153.
Dziadkowiec O, Durbin J, Muralidharan VJ, Novak M, Cornett B. Improving the Quality and Design of Retrospective Clinical Outcome Studies That Utilize Electronic Health Records. Hospital Corporation of America: Healthcare Journal of Medicine. 2020 Jun; 1(3): 131. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1094.
Yuan Y, Shi B, Yost R, Liu X, Tian Y, Zhu Y et al. Optimization of Management Zone Delineation for Precision Crop Management in an Intensive Farming System. Plants. 2022 Oct; 11(19): 2611. doi: 10.3390/plants11192611.
Barrow NJ. The Effects of pH on Phosphate Uptake from the Soil. Plant and Soil. 2017 Jan; 410(1): 401-10. doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-3008-9.
Shapiro SS and Wilk MB. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika. 1965 Dec; 52(3-4): 591-611. doi: 10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591.
Pearson K. Note on Regression and Inheritance in the Case of Two Parents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 1895 Jan; 58: 240-2. doi: 10.1098/rspl.1895.0041.
Fisher RA. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. 1934.
Joanes DN and Gill CA. Comparing Measures of Sample Skewness and Kurtosis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician). 1998 Apr; 47(1): 183-9. doi: 10.1111/1467-9884.00122.
Dong Y, Werling B, Cao Z, Li G. Implementation of an in-field IoT system for Precision Irrigation Management. Frontiers in Water. 2024 Feb; 6: 1353597. doi: 10.3389/frwa.2024.1353597.
Borah S, Kumar R, Mukherjee S. Design and Characterization of a Low-Cost Capacitive Soil Moisture Sensor System for IoT-based Agriculture Applications. 2023.
Garg D, Singh H, Shacham-Diamand Y. AdapTree: Data-Driven Approach to Assessing Plant Stress Through The AI-Sensor Synergy. Sensors. 2025 May; 25(10): 3149. doi: 10.3390/s25103149.
Althubaiti A. Sample Size Determination: A Practical Guide for Health Researchers. Journal of General and Family Medicine. 2023 Mar; 24(2): 72-8. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.600.
Tang W, Guo H, Baskin CC, Xiong W, Yang C, Li Z et al. Effect of Light Intensity on Morphology, Photosynthesis and Carbon Metabolism of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Seedlings. Plants. 2022 Jun; 11(13): 1688. doi: 10.3390/plants11131688.
Kruskal WH and Wallis WA. Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1952 Dec; 47(260): 583-621. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Futuristic Biotechnology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments editor@fbtjournal.com

